| Author |
Message |
    
Cjking
New member
Username: Cjking
Post Number: 1
Registered: 02-2004
Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Thursday, February 19, 2004 - 02:35 pm: |    |
Unless I'm cracking up I've had two anomalies recently. The tutor has told me I should have stood on soft 17, but the instruction book table for multiple decks says never stand on soft 17. The tutor has also just told me I should have stood on soft 18 with the dealer on 10, the table says hit. (The game is "Las Vegas Strip" with 6 decks, if that matters.)
Did I miscount or is there a discrepancy between the tutor and the table? |
Cjking
New member
Username: Cjking
Post Number: 2
Registered: 02-2004
Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Friday, February 20, 2004 - 03:46 am: | |
OK here's an example where I managed to write it down while it was still on the screen.
Dealer has 9, I have 3-3-A, I hit, tutor says I should have stood. Rules in instruction book for A-6 say I should hit. |
Cjking
New member
Username: Cjking
Post Number: 5
Registered: 02-2004
Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Friday, February 20, 2004 - 07:08 am: | |
A third example, I had A 5 A against dealer K, I said hit, tutor says I should have stood.
(Message edited by cjking on February 20, 2004)
(Message edited by cjking on February 20, 2004) |
|
